"There are still more unknown than the unknown soldier: his wife!"
Some of our social categorisations are as follows: when they work well and take for granted, we forget that they are primarily a product of human activity, a real building social, as demonstrated by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann in their time. It's so that our society tends to perpetuate itself and to specialize in a role which seeks to define sustainable categories that we avoid unnecessary re-examine continually in our daily lives. "Berger and Luckmann called this process" institutionalization ", understood as a" reciprocal typification of habitual actions. " If individuals who have created an institution there are still traces of their activity, the following generations see it as inherent in the nature of things. " Ceremonies Cesar and Oscar - and more rankings justifying them - were well established and ever-present true categories that make us walk so that they appear to us as quite natural. They give rewards in that they assign, and everyone waits eagerly, rather than roles, but a distribution of roles for the least strange Actor / Actress, Best Actor for a Supporting Role / Best actress for a supporting role.
can imagine it would be extremely interesting to extend our awards to see who would, for example, the "best set" and why. However, without reaching the limits of this reasoning, we can already ask the question of why such a critical score on the sexual category "actor"? could moreover ask why do we not making no duets such as "Best Director / Best director, Best designer / decorator Best "? But no, the partition only affects the sexual acting. Each role. To believe that the trades of actor and actress would be almost different trades. They are enshrined in all cases the difference.
If that is the case, then it is to review our entire system of training actors, auditions, our daily look at. If this is not the case, then must appeal to the disappearance of these distinctions and how men and women compete in the same category "Best Actor" ... One small step towards recognition of women in a real world where male dominance can dress with rhinestones and sequins to win applause in front of all moved thereby contributing to express differences where it would make sense to remove them as a priority: the worlds of culture, small factories par excellence of our collective representations. Beyond even the symbolic meaning that it is, it is worth thinking about the importance of actually playing in the same category.