Already been a month ... that the air conditioning running at full speed in the office. The one nicknamed Pépette is gradually his colleagues go on vacation with their unfailing regularity, their will to believe they have well deserved such expensive holiday destinations in their mundane to die. Lucienne even going to redo the shot of "I'm going in the Vosges," then it will be liposucked the beads. Pépette, she will not leave. She plays this false pride tinged with irony to declare that it prefers to be loft that lifter. In fact, canned Pépette strange legacy dating from the summer of his 21 years. The summer departure of Jaws . "I could never get over it, I think all the time when I start to receive these postcards to send me tracks that my colleagues. Besides these cards, I do not even read a vague glance over and that's enough to pass me anxiety: the blue sea under a bright sun never more resonance for me other than a primitive fear, an ever present danger of a great white shark stubborn, greedy and terribly clever. There on their hot sand, all these vacationers sunbathing elongated eggplants that look like sets side by side on the markets, the most ripe to be consumed in the day, the shark knows ... And I know shark knows, and besides everyone knows that the shark knows it ... But it wants to play good, it feels smarter swimsuit that beast rough skin. What pleasure can we still feel in 2001 Swim in a deep sea, which may arise to any animal that breathes in the water, it ... an animal that can take you as he wants him ... Twenty five years I continued in the early heats of the I was to board every night this horrible vision that Spielberg has given us by playing his POV to include the shark that approaches from below the silhouette of the girl who swims, offered, served, and perfectly marinated ... ". 
filmed advertisements against smoking aim to impress their audience by encouraging them to quit smoking in their daily lives, that is to say become, after weaning, spectators of other smokers. This super-spectator status beaches and swimming in the sea, Pépette has won without his knowledge, because of this great white was petrified and that earned him - she recalls with a smile - his nickname: "Pépette is the little black dog who plays a teenager on the beach at the beginning of the story, he throws him a stick to the sea, the dog dives and never returned ... Of course, I realize that any this is ridiculous, I would have to exceed my fears in the film as Richard Dreyfuss and Robert Shaw. But they can afford it ... Like them, I would have liked to live that moment so precious and so important that, in camera in the cabin of their boat, they in turn reveal their shark bites a bit like little boys compare the size of their penis to ward off each other's neurosis ... But I have nothing to show ... and it's worse, what I regret most, because I believe in life, the scars continue to carry heavier certainly those that we produce is physically impossible. Hear it as you want .... " 
Inhuman, inhuman too. In the gallery of Disney characters, it is one that wins all the votes of exasperation with almost all young readers of the Journal de Mickey and Scrooge Magazine : in French it is called Gontran Happiness (Gladstone Gander English). Stereotype the snob and a dandy in his Sunday best, Gontran Happiness is not a duck, it's a jar, a jar boastful, arrogant dandy always dressed to the nines, a follower of the costumes and hair bent sharply serrated. One can easily imagine a cologne lavandée covers the slightest hint of sweating in this animal that oozes vanity and incomprehensible vein. Lorsqu'enfant, it has not yet built - as we all inevitably do one day - our little personal theory on luck and happiness, the good and evil, fate and providence, meet at the bend a narrative drawn inevitably undermines Gontran Happiness a little. It embodies no doubt one of the most authentic of the individual stinking, self-centered and proud of it. Gontran Happiness is an aristocrat who have related party with a spell of sustained an injustice so overwhelming that we can refer those who have given themselves the trouble to be born, even those who do not need anything to succeed precisely because "everything" they succeeded. 
In the spirit of cartoonist Carl Barks Gontran that Happiness was born in 1948. And, because we had to make this character a few acceptable its creator has invented a destiny, a genealogy own to explain where it came from and, in turn, to excuse a little bit what it is without managing to generate a true compassion in its audiences. only Son of Daphne Duck and Gustave Happiness, Happiness Gontran lost his parents after a free picnic, the latter having too stuffed foods offered. Gontran had to be adopted by Matilda McDuck's sister. It is therefore an absurdist drama as no one knows them in vain Iosnesco that Mr. Bliss was born. Loaded symbols of luck, trampling clover four-leaf clover leaf on the individual does not, however, why he can buy up love in a world where everything seems to arrange themselves to make life the easiest, most natural way that is easy. Besides, knowing no trouble living, he knows - when he wrote that he covets the beautiful Daisy, that using words that resemble his life "my little candy, my little pie tatin, etc.. ". As underlined by the nephews of Donald in a short story titled The Love Letters " his prose is so sweet it would give us Diabetes ". However, if it may seem amazing, lucky Gontran Happiness always turns against him. Is easily understood: since no merit to live, none of his actions can not be inspired by any heroism. Envy he might arouse his or her fellow players unfailingly turns into contempt. And, the consideration for the chance becomes clear. Gontran Happiness, while lucky he is, remains and will remain all his life, a jar dedicated to the most extreme deserts. 
are accepted without difficulty this for moral tales of Mr. Happy because this conclusion seems to us to restore some justice, a world order where it is established that we can have it all. Clearly, the role and effect of Gontran foil prémâchent accompanying us from childhood, this ideology of domination (probably brought by both by the dominant Catholic moral and social diffuse than default sometimes called "culture") which is the basis of this common sense that locks our lives on the screen " nobody can have everything in life and good . How do we know when give some estimates Gontran Happiness is, ultimately, the first victim of our cruelty ideological. Would we not better at the bottom, if we accept with joy the happiness of those who succeed with arrogance and without any effort? Another moral Gontran Happiness never know and probably neither do we in the shadow of the bell jar so well informed by our quest for merit and recognition. Too human ... 
Since November 6, 2010, a rumor ignited the web. We have found evidence that time travel exist! It was George Clarke, an Irish director, who said evidence uncovered by looking closely at the bonus DVD that have the "making of" film The Circus Charlie Chaplin filmed in 1928. In fact, Chaplin was careful at the time of filming those who went to the premiere screening of his film. historian Marc Ferro has long defended the fact that we had to consider the documentary images as sources essential to interpret the past. It was through the latter found that the German people of the country never took himself seriously when he was taken to greet the Führer. Stifled laughter often followed hello. Without detailed examination of these images, you would think, "says Marc Ferro, this whole people believed in his actions and meanings that accompanied them. Documentary films we demonstrate that not. 
is a similar exercise which has engaged George Clarke with the making-of documentary Chaplin. One can discover the rest, its interpretation on YouTube (here ). Clarke draws our attention to a lady with a hat pulled low over his head. It is present in the image moments. It crosses the frame, passing between the film poster of Chaplin and a beautiful fake zebra. The lady emissions an object against her ear and appears to speak at the same time it works. Neither one, nor two, George Clarke acknowledged there any gesture that motivates us today when we phone in the street. A gesture today transposed in 1928! And it is this observation correct, but decontextualized, that Clarke invites us to imagine that this lady is a lady today filmed by the camera unexpectedly Chaplin. Thanks to some unknown machine latter, a lively curiosity flawless would projected in time to see - we know the taste of some compulsive passion for this practice - the 'real' first Circus. 
Although this is a joke, we observe how Clark argues, and exudes a genuine conviction to lead us to the interpretation of time travel. We know a picture coupled with a good argument would have us believe any what. The news proves it every day. Yet this is the buzz among Internet users, many of which appear to seriously adhere to the version of time travel. We forget too often, so that an image is not only received in a space of perception is the "show" and "said" or "commented". An image is always received with what we also want to see, to believe, to imagine it. And we can not answer that to the imagination with imagination. Also to test the theory of sustainable Clarke, we must first recall of we have phoned in to the street. They were observed by all, we walked away from it, embarrassed, as we are embarrassed by those who drank more than others around the diners. This is not the case here. Finally, we would imagine to credit Clark as telephone conversations that would not run only in space but in time, from one era to another and that the antennas would be installed without our knowledge since at least the beginning of last century. Therefore, the only question worth asking at watching this little movie is: if it was indeed a fan of time travel from our present (and even our near future), so who that lady in the hat she could call in 1928? 
